Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.
At this year’s Commencement ceremony, USC President C. L. Max Nikias will confer Honorary Baccalaureate and Honorary Master’s degrees on Japanese-American former students who were interned during World War II.
Referred to as Nisei (“second generation” in Japanese, although the term refers to first-generation Japanese-Americans), the students at USC and many other universities were forced to abandon their studies in 1942 when President Franklin Roosevelt ordered the internment of American citizens of Japanese descent and Japanese nationals living along the Pacific Coast.
“We are privileged to honor the accomplishments and the dreams of the Nisei students who are highly deserving of receiving a college degree for the work they have done at USC,” said USC President C. L. Max Nikias. “Through the years these students have been among the most passionate and dedicated members of the Trojan Family. We are honored that our Nisei students have an enduring devotion to USC and we want them to know that the university is also devoted to them.”
I wrote recently on higher education and the APIA community. For too long students have been ignored and pushed to the wayside, our issues and hardships left unnoticed. We call on our legislators to sign our pledge in order to bring more transparency and affordability to our public universities.
While the University of Washington’s demographic shifts have been sharper and faster — international students were 2 percent of the freshmen in 2006 — similar changes are under way at flagship public universities across the nation: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa and University of California campuses in Berkeley and Los Angeles all had at least 10 percent foreign freshmen this academic year, more than twice that of five years ago. And at top private schools including Columbia University, Boston University and the University of Pennsylvania, at least 15 percent of this year’s freshmen are from other countries.
All told, the number of undergraduates from China alone has soared to 57,000 from 10,000 five years ago. At the University of Washington, 11 percent of the nearly 5,800 freshmen are from China.
A few places have begun to charge international students additional fees besides tuition: at Purdue University, it was $1,000 this year and will double next year; engineering undergraduates at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign had to pay a $2,500 surcharge this year.
“We’re in something akin to the gold rush, a frontier-style environment where colleges and universities, like prospectors in the 1800s, realize that there is gold out there,” said David Hawkins, the director of public policy at the National Association for College Admission Counseling. “While it’s the admissions offices butting up against the issues most right now, every department after them, every faculty member who comes into contact with international students, is going to have to recalibrate as institutions become more international. I see a cascading list of challenges.”
As some of you know, I am extremely involved with the higher education campaign (especially in New York). The organizations I work with most, Save Our SUNY and New York Students Rising, focus on the public education systems in New York City and New York State. When I was at the White House AAPI Initiative briefing earlier this month, I asked the higher education panel about how the failures of America’s higher education institutes affect the APIA community. The response I mostly received was that “higher education is an American issue, not solely an Asian American issue”.
I don’t think that’s right. As I replied back to the panel, the issues of college affordability, program cuts, financial aid, and the quality of the education we receive is very much an APIA issue. By blanketing problems as “American problems”, the crucial factors of how race and ethnicity play into the situation are ignored.
Let’s think back on this year: we’ve had students deliberately not marking ‘Asian’ in order to get into college. We’ve had anti-affirmative action bake sales. We found out that Asians are statistically the most bullied in schools. Asian American studies programs are being cut nationwide.
Speaking on what I know best, the fight to preserve funding for New York’s state schools is just as much about preserving an accessible education for communities of color. By raising tuition in an institution (City Universities of New York for example), blocks out potential students from low income communities. CUNY, which used to be free, was and is sometimes the only chance for people to go to college. The same can be said for California’s CSU system.
Education is a right, not a privilege. It shouldn’t be something that we have to fight for, but reality shows that the road to education access is long and hard. We have great legislation like the DREAM Act that challenges existing notions of who “deserves” an education and fights for our people.
So now let me turn this question to you: do you think higher education is purely an American issue?
Open your eyes. Learn, get involved, and MOVE.
价钱增加
去年夏天,纽约批准NYSUNY2020,一个该法提出了五年多的学费$1500。在经济不稳定的时候,这个变化增加每个家庭的债务。工作很难找到。为了找到工作,学生需要更多的教育。
私有化
为了省钱,纽约政治家和大学校长同公司合作。但是这伤害了我们的社会。学质量变得更糟。但我们付出更多的钱我们没有的钱。学校是为学生,我们需要支持的学生。我们不应该支持富有的人!
削减预算
纽约州立大学和纽约市立大学需要保护。去年的变化带来了更大的班,教师下岗,学者淘汰。我们付出更多的金钱,但低劣的教育。
税收不公平
说实话,纽约州有学校需要的钱。改革税制,将返回纽约州的钱。这些钱可以回到学校。扩大税和拯救我们的学生!州长科莫承诺不纳税,但通过增加学费,他是征税学生。孩子们是最不能付税。
治理
现在,学生和家长没有大学决策中的代表性。相反,科莫任命管理员。学生的声音被沉默。只是因为个人的关系,这些陌生人被选择。没有人,特别是学生,学校怎样花钱。我们付出的数千花秘密。这是错误的,政策应该透明和公开的。每个家庭都应该决定我们的学费是怎样花的。
我们是一家横跨纽约州的学生网络我们保证捍卫教育
我们是学生
我们是教师
我们是父母
我们 是 家庭
我们是邻居
我们是工人
我们是大家的未来!